ISBN:
B07C86VZ2C
Title: Justice in Plain Sight Pdf How a Small-Town Newspaper and Its Unlikely Lawyer Opened America's Courtrooms
Justice in Plain Sight is the story of a hometown newspaper in Riverside, California, that set out to do its job: tell readers about shocking crimes in their own backyard. But when judges slammed the courtroom door on the public, including the press, it became impossible to tell the whole story. Pinning its hopes on business lawyer Jim Ward, whom Press-Enterprise editor Tim Hays had come to know and trust, the newspaper took two cases to the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1980s. Hays was convinced that the public—including the press—needed to have these rights and needed to bear witness to justice because healing in the aftermath of a horrible crime could not occur without community catharsis. The newspaper won both cases and established First Amendment rights that significantly broadened public access to the judicial system, including the right for the public to witness jury selection and preliminary hearings.
Justice in Plain Sight is a unique story that, for the first time, details two improbable journeys to the Supreme Court in which the stakes were as high as they could possibly be (and still are): the public's trust in its own government.
An Excellent Book for a Specific Audience Justice in Plain Sight is an excellent book for a specific audience. As a lawyer, I was intrigued to read about the two Press Enterprise cases – something I hadn’t studied in law school. The ultimate issue was whether the press and the public had a right of access to court proceedings, and if so, how to balance those rights with the privacy interests of the litigants and (would-be) jurors. Given the current importance of the role of the press in today’s judicial system, a review of the cases that brought us here is clearly warranted.The book itself begins with a bit of backstory, delineating the criminal cases that ultimately served as the backdrop for the Supreme Court decisions. The book quickly escalates from there, giving insight into both the people behind the cases – those who worked at the newspaper and their legal team – as well as the intricacies of the law. The legal discussion was fascinating, offering assessments of the various positions taken by the parties, as well as the notes and comments of specific Supreme Court Justices.Justice in Plain Sight was well-researched and well-written. Given the fact that the cases were heard in the Eighties and the underlying events took place in the Seventies, it is impressive that Dan Bernstein was able to cull so much information from a wide variety of sources, including newspaper personnel, Supreme Court law clerks and other participants from both sides of the legal argument.I would highly recommend Justice in Plain Sight to anyone who is interested in the law and in the public’s role in the court system.Note: I received an ARC of Justice in Plain Sight from NetGalley and the University of Nebraska Press. The above is my honest review.Enjoyable book with interesting details These days it's common to see high profile trials on television, like those of Jeffrey Dahmer; Lyle and Erik Menendez; O.J. Simpson; Scott Peterson; Martha Stewart; Jody Arias; Dr. Conrad Murray; Casey Anthony; Aaron Hernandez; and others. At one time, however, courtrooms could be closed to the public on the whim of the presiding judge.In this book, Dan Bernstein - a former journalist for the Riverside, California 'Press-Enterprise' - tells the story of his newspaper's leading role in two Supreme Court decisions that opened the courtrooms. Bernstein's story is fascinating from a legal standpoint, since the public now has a constitutional right to observe trials - and even preliminary hearings - from beginning to end. Exceptions occur if there are COMPELLING reasons to close the courtroom with NO OTHER REMEDIES - but this is a very high bar.The book is also interesting for its details about the players, including newspaper people, attorneys, judges, law clerks, and Supreme Court justices. Bernstein describes their backgrounds, personalities, quirks, opinions and so on - all of which provides a fine personal touch.*****Prior to the 1980s the public was often banned from California courtrooms for at least parts of trials. This was usually done to preserve the privacy of jurors during voir dire and/or to insure that the defendant got a fair trial. Most California newspapers, including the Press-Enterprise, didn't make a fuss.However, when three heinous crimes in the early 1980s resulted in death penalty trials in Riverside County, Press-Enterprise publisher Tim Hays wanted to cover the whole shebang - including voir dire and preliminary hearings. Hays felt the public had a right to know exactly how the criminal justice system worked, and to observe that it (presumably) operated fairly.The trio of crimes included the rape of a white high school student by an African-American man named Albert Greenwood Brown; a deadly bank robbery engineered by Christopher and Russell Harven and their gang; and the murder of twelve elderly hospital patients by a male nurse called Robert Rubane Diaz.The first trial to draw Hays' attention was that of rapist Albert Brown, in which the judge blocked access to jury selection. Feeling the public had a right to observe voir dire - and encouraged by executive editor Norman Cherniss and senior editor Mel Opotowsky - Hays hired a lawyer to represent the Press-Enterprise. The litigator was Jim Ward - the self-styled 'world's greatest attorney.' 😊Ward asked the trial judge to open voir dire, then approached the California appellate court, and finally petitioned the California Supreme Court.....all to no avail. After much deliberation, Ward appealed to the United States Supreme Court, a step-by-step procedure that's carefully explained in the book. Luckily, the Supreme Court elected to hear the case.Ward's preparations and appearance before the Supreme Court - as well as the justices' thoughts and exchanges and the maneuverings of opposing parties - are described in detail. This makes for riveting reading. I was amused to see that Justice Harry Blackmun - in his private notes - described Ward as "greying & glasses" and rated Ward's presentation as a 5 (out of 10). Ward also had a jocular exchange with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, in which he essentially said "I'll be back."The Supreme Court's resulting 1984 decision was a victory for the Press-Enterprise, whose front page story read "Supreme Court Says Open Jury Selection Is To Be The Rule."Next, multiple murderer Robert Diaz's pretrial formalities drew the Press-Enterprise's attention to preliminary hearings. These hearings - since they often lead to plea bargains - are frequently the entirety of 'a trial.' As Ward predicted, he was back at the Supreme Court in 1986 - this time to argue for open preliminary hearings. Once again all of Ward's preparations - and the thoughts and actions of the other participants - are thoroughly explicated.This time attorney Jim Ward and his wife arrived in Washington, D.C. days ahead of the Supreme Court hearing and enjoyed "French toast at Gadsby's Tavern.....dinner at a sedate and excellent French restaurant....lunch at the University Club.....the fun, trendy, cluttered Filomena Italian Restaurant....the clock exhibit at the Renwick Gallery.....and a trip to the Bureau of Printing and Engraving." It seems like Ward was much more relaxed this time around. 🙂👌After the Supreme Court presentations Ward prevailed once again, and the justices ruled that the public and press have a right to attend pretrial hearings. The combination of Supreme Court rulings essentially "pried open America's courtrooms, barring judges from arbitrarily shutting the public out of criminal trials and hearings."In an epilogue, Bernstein mentions a number of criminal proceedings since the 1980s that were kept open because of the above rulings, even when the prosecution and /or defense requested closure. The public has a right to know.The end of the book includes a long section of notes and acknowledgements, attesting to the copious research that went into this narrative.Full disclosure: the book felt a bit padded in places. However, I thoroughly enjoyed it and recommend it to readers interested in the subject.Thanks to Netgalley, the author (Dan Bernstein) and the publisher (University of Nebraska Press) for a copy of the book.Excellence In Plain Sight. This book does an amazing job of highlighting two crucial Supreme Court decisions, the immediate history leading up to them, the particular cases that spawned them, the people involved at every level of these cases, and even the impact these two cases would have many years later. And it explains some very particular legalese in a way that virtually anyone who can read at least at a high school level can read and understand easily. In other words, Bernstein does for the public what these cases themselves did for the press and lawyers: allows us to appreciate just how monumental these two cases were. Very highly recommended reading for everyone.
Seven Killers I pdf
_B00N5AODQ4_100.png)
A Belle of the Fifties (Expanded, Annotated) pdf
The Girl Who Could Change Fate pdf
Smooth Talker pdf
Stacked pdf
Echo Canyon Brides Box Set - Books 1 - 3 pdf
THE CRATE pdf
Torture Mom pdf
True Crime Stories pdf
Obeying Evil pdf
A Special Kind Of Evil pdf
Sinclair pdf
Tags: B07C86VZ2C pdf,Justice in Plain Sight pdf,How a Small-Town Newspaper and Its Unlikely Lawyer Opened America's Courtrooms pdf,ebook,Dan Bernstein,Justice in Plain Sight: How a Small-Town Newspaper and Its Unlikely Lawyer Opened America's Courtrooms,University of Nebraska Press,Conduct of court proceedings - United States,Conduct of court proceedings;United States.,Free press and fair trial - United States,Free press and fair trial;United States.,General Adult,HISTORY / United States / 20th Century,HISTORY / United States / State & Local / West (AK, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, UT, WY),History,History/United States - 20th Century,History/United States - State & Local - West (AK, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, UT, WY),Journalism, Legal - United States,LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Journalism,LAW / Legal History,Law,Law/Legal History,Legal Studies; Proposition 9; California; Legal History; Political Science; Political Reform Act; Campaign Finance; Press-Enterprise; Riverside; Journalism; Jim Ward; Tim Hays; Supreme Court; 1980s; First Amendment; Newspaper; Public Access; Judicial System; Trials; Courtrooms; Freedom of the Press,Legal Studies;Proposition 9;California;Legal History;Political Science;Political Reform Act;Campaign Finance;Press-Enterprise;Riverside;Journalism;Jim Ward;Tim Hays;Supreme Court;1980s;First Amendment;Newspaper;Public Access;Judicial System;Trials;Courtrooms;Freedom of the Press,Newspaper court reporting - United States,Newspaper court reporting;United States.,Non-Fiction,UNIVERSITY PRESS,United States,HISTORY / United States / 20th Century,HISTORY / United States / State & Local / West (AK, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, UT, WY),History/United States - 20th Century,History/United States - State & Local - West (AK, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, UT, WY),LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Journalism,LAW / Legal History,Law/Legal History
s.igikahrab024
_B002Q0Y27Y_100.png)
_B01CO6W9Y2_100.png)
_B078X393GC_100.png)
_B07MLYZC4L_100.png)
_B07CKKMDGC_100.png)